Anthroposophy and Race
Everett's Story
This is not the first time that our Urphänomen group has discussed the issue of racist statements appearing in Steiner's work (see this blog post to get caught up). Everett, an anthroposophist and professor of Black Studies, found these earlier dialogues and reached out to ask if he might share his story. He will join us live to discuss what he shared in the video above in a few days, a conversation we will also share here.
Everett's story is an important contribution, in our view, toward imagining the future of anthroposophia on Earth. He mentions the work of Peter Staudenmaier, perhaps the most widely known critic of Rudolf Steiner and anthroposophy. You can read some of his work at this link.
Following Everett’s recording above, our Urphänomen group met for a dialogue, which you can watch here:
In our opinion, the biggest obstacle in the way of the future of anthroposophy (with a small a) is the worship of Steiner as unerring. We do a great disservice to the stream he was attempting to further, and commit a kind of treason against our own spirit and individual capacities as thinkers/feelers/willers, if we do not put his claims to the test in our own experience. When we (Ashton and Matt) do so, it is not difficult at all for us to acknowledge that he was wrong about the effects of skin color on the consciousness of present day humanity. Whether or not blood was more significant in the past, it is clear in our present pluralistic planetary context that humanity simply has no future if it chooses to continue along the divisive path of racial identitarianism. Steiner's conflicting statements over decades about the relative importance of race vs. the I suggest to me an inner struggle that he, unfortunately, could not work out for us. Those who find value in many of his writings and lectures must undertake this task for themselves. For our part, we find it essential both for Steiner's legacy and for the ongoing work of anthroposophia that we unambiguously reject the degenerate idea of racial determinism (whether biological or spiritual) in all its guises. There can be no such thing as the spirit of humanity unless we do so.
…
Below is a letter written by Andrew Sullivan, a Waldorf teacher and anthroposophist that was originally published in Being Human. We appreciate the spirit of renewal he is inviting into the Great Work of all those called to participate with Anthroposophia.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIhhC5X2jFY I suggest we invite Orland to our next session on the subject. Clearly the Christ impulse is inspiring him as he offers his will as a gift to a collective meta intellectual alive as possibility in all of us.
"In order to really comply with the law of neighbourly love one must ... allow one's light to shine ... on "all" human beings and not merely on a sect or organisation of potentially like-minded people. And this can be done absolutely only if one is completely free and has not bound oneself to any society. Besides, this would provide neither training nor practise in maintaining our spiritual power in the public society on the outside if all those who could give society spiritual power and strength left it by linking up with or walling themselves up in a society of like-minded people, whom they would then very easily tend to favour. The road towards the light thus leads no longer "into" sects, but "out" of them and "into" the general public. But this can be done absolutely only through every single being learning to understand that it must keep itself free so that it can shine on "all" human beings in its surroundings. Here keeping oneself free means not binding oneself to phenomena or involving oneself in phenomena that give rise to tendencies to favour. Being a member of a sect or some other religious movement and not favouring its members more than outsiders is very difficult. Enrolment in such a movement is in itself already favouritism. Since practising the law of neighbourly love is the intention of life, this is what one must train oneself to do."
Martinus (Danish spiritual scientist, 1890-1981)
https://www.martinus.dk/en/ttt/index.php?bog=54&stk=1496